Many people believe that mobile phones cause more harms than the benefits and that's why mobile phones should be restricted?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons to support your viewpoint.
With the advent of mobile phone, our form of living, ranging from daily shopping to working with colleagues, has been revolutionised in numerous ways. While some pessimists argues that the overall impact to individual and society is detrimental, I personally defend for the antithesis. In this essay, I will elaborate my position by referring to some societal studies.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that mobile phone provides us a myriad of information we need to facilitate our livelihood. This is because, coupled with the Internet connecting countless source of knowledge, this device allows free flow of information entailing weather reports, financial live statistic and breaking news. The prevalence of this kind of utilisation can be revealed in recent studies conducted by the Google Corporation, in which retrieving news constituted over 50% of mobile usages in last year. Consequently, with the immediacy provided by this invention, we can response quickly in our daily lives.
Further and more importantly, though, is the new form of communication enabling us stay close to our beloved ones. Although the establishment of long distance call places an opportunity for relating to those working in faraway countries, the exorbitant price accompanied perplex most users. However, having installed application like Telegram, we are likely to contact each other in a more affordable mean. Moreover, statistics from the Vodafone Corporation showed a persistent decline in the usage of the legacy technology, and concluded that the change ensues growth of these tools of instant messaging bundled on mobile phone.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm that the emergence of mobile phone leads us to a better life by interconnecting people more effectively and placing the information at our fingertips. In the future, we are likely to see more innovative use of mobile phones regardless to any restriction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11448230048 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1414917325 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147416959937 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511070540497 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528356026171 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961504053837 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546354076497 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.