To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.
Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.
Critics throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether some of the advertisement in today's media such as television, radio, posters and the Internet are immoral and unacceptable or not. Despite the considerable value to the associated business sectors, the ensuing drawbacks are now becoming increasingly concerned by the public. This essay will assert the notion that some of them are unethical and unacceptable under today's moral standard.
To begin with, the misleading information in advertisement is intuitively deemed unethical. The central reason behind this stems from the fact that commercials that gain noise from the public often consist of fabricated information. In fact, there has been evidently a surge in lodged complaints in mismatched content between TV commercials and their actual products. Moreover, it should not be forgotten that some producers selectively hide the underlying drawbacks of their products during the production of advertisements. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that certain employment of advertising skills, to a considerable extent, is cheating the public.
Another factor that is worth mentioning is the improper messages embedded in some of these commercials. More specifically, in comparison to the initial idea of marketing, which aims at increasing the public awareness on the functions of its product, a considerable number of commercials hosted online are now containing explicit information. Examples can invariably be found in tobacco and perfume industry. For instance, the majority of their video advertisement comprise a couple of seconds showing girls in sexy dress prior to taking a nice shot of its series. Consistent with this line of thinking is that children who absorbed this message will have their mental growth affected. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that the use of advertising skill should be supervised to protect the juniors.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence suggesting the current employment of advertising methods are immoral and far away from the general acceptance. Given the increasing concern of citizens, it is predicted that the government will enact any measures to restrict the use of media in the foreseeable future.
- Different cultures are mixing today and the world is becoming a global village. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 89
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Different cultures are mixing today and the world is becoming a global village. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development?(Updated August 2018) 89
- In some countries, using the internet in school is getting popular. Is it positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nd developed world have debated whether some of the advertisement in todays media such as t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ble number of commercials hosted online are now containing explicit information. Examples can inva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59237536657 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11374537433 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609970674487 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9992187424 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1875 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119541267541 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350717953538 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297873314168 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691551165274 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00948509728389 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.