The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph compares the changing consumption of water that employed in various sectors around the globe, whereas the use of water in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo is revealed in the table below.
As shown from the information provided, water used for agricultural purpose was persistently in the dominant position from 500 km^3 in 1990 to a staggering 3000 km^3 in 2000. Meanwhile, standing at less than 100km^3 in 1990, the amount of water employed by people at factories and homes was practically identical prior to 1940. From the time onwards, a surge in requisition of water for industries was seen around the globe, overtaking its domestic counterpart. In 2000, with approximately 1200km^3, the volume of water used by industrial sites were tripled of that in worldwide household.
In respect to the figures of two selected countries, the population of Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively. Likewise, the irrigated land owned by Brazil was 200 times of that of Democratic Republic of Congo. Noteworthy is the fact that a striking 359 m^3 was consumed by a citizen in Brazil, whereas a resident in Democratic Republic of Congo utilised a relatively insignificant amount of water at 8m^3.
Overall, the water consumption is greatly affected by agriculture and this notion could be supported by contrasting figures of these two countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22466960352 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99507639983 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0589734361 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.777777778 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290349868393 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115304037195 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885298644674 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185692036601 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869467476714 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.