The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

The bar chart compares how many visitors used three different important airports in New York City over a period of 6 years.
It is clear that all the number of travelers of these airports increased considerably over the period shown. Additionally, LaGuardia was the most popular airport for passengers.
In 1995, the number of visitors choosing the LaGuardia airport was highest, at about 36 million, while the figure for the Newark was significantly lower, at only around 17 million. Meanwhile, about approximately 28 million passengers who used the John F. Kennedy. In 1997, the John F. Kennedy, the LaGuardia, the Newark all experienced increases in their figures.
Between 1998 and 2000, the number of travelers using the LaGuardia continued to grow to 68 million and became the highest figure in the chart, whereas the John F. Kennedy's figure saw a gradual rise to roughly 43 million in 2000. At the same time, the figure for the Newark remained stable at slightly above 40 million.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04268292683 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72856826394 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5020878642 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24413809672 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867970775568 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948682622791 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156995339476 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778758112488 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.