The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The depicted bar graph enumerates the ratio of visitors using three respective principal airports in New York City for over six years.

Overall, it clearly indicates that the majority of sightseers had opted the La Guardia Airport the most over the given period. However, tourists seem to use the New York Airport the lowest.

To initiate, most of the tourists had used La Guardia Airport the most over six years, peaking from the roughly one-third million of passengers in 1995 to approximately 42 million of commuters in 1997 which later risen at nearly 70 million of travelers in 2000.

On the contrary, the least sightseers seem to opt Newark Aiport while traveling, inclining from 15 million of passengers to about 40 million of travelers in the late 20th century which remained stable in following three years. Moreover, passengers of John F.kennedy had experienced a certain fluctuation throughout the years.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ars, peaking from the roughly one-third million of passengers in 1995 to approximately ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, third, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24832214765 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72765747669 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.962886987 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156294060942 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866523300196 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063700156751 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106614398676 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524579589863 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.