The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the prevalence of various means that junior schoolers employed on commuting to and from school in the year of 1990 and 2010. In general, the data differ significantly.
As shown in the information of 1990, walking, which accounted for a staggering 12 million number of trips in that year, was in the dominant position among the five ways. By contrast, the figures of the methods including cycling, bus and a combination of both walking and bus were practically identical at 6 millions trips. Meanwhile, registering just above 4 millions trips, the use of car was the least popular among students at their play age.
In stark contrast, this country, however, had witnessed a doubled surge in the utilization of car in subsequent decades. According to the data collected in 2010, the number of trips conducted by students who travelled to and from school by car soared to 11 millions. Such mode entailing adoption of private vehicles surpassed all other modes of transportation. In fact, significant declines were observed in its counterparts, whereby the methods involving walking were halved in the meantime.
Overall, the majority of students went to school on foot in 1990, whereas cars were heavily relied in 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12745098039 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88763355152 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622549019608 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3621885217 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173156846701 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063858106126 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058160745739 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104724945473 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337215657057 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.