The chart below shows numbers of adults participating in different major sports in one area, in 1997 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given bar graph illustrates how many adults participated in 7( Gentle walking, Basketball, Cricket, Jogging, Aerobic Gym, Football, Hiking) major sports in a particular area, in 1997 and 2017.
Overall, in 2017,except cricket participation in all other sport events had been increased. An exponential rise was seen in basketball, foot ball and hiking. In both 1997 and 2017, maximum participation was seen in the Gentle walking event. On the other hand, least participation was seen in basketball in 1997 and cricket in 2017.
Firstly, In 1997, Gentle walking had the most participants with fifty thousand people, whereas even after two decades, this event still had the maximum number of participants with approximately fifity four thousand people. Least involved event was basketball with little lower than ten thousand people. All other events had more than 25,000 participants.
In 2017, a massive hike was seen in participation among basketball enthusiatist with more than 24,000 people. Cricket is the only sport while was in a decreasing trend from almost 28,000 people in 1997 to fewer than 5,000 people in 2017.Number of participants for Football and hiking showed a similar rising trend (1997 - more than 32,000 people and 2017 nearly 50,000 people), while people enrolling for Aerobic gym remained static (almost 35,000 people) in both the years.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
... Gentle walking event. On the other hand, least participation was seen in basketball in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Number
...1997 to fewer than 5,000 people in 2017.Number of participants for Football and hiking...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, still, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3738317757 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80907129806 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560747663551 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.7649715305 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158140280521 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727420700083 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566655640953 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113063520626 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482339843776 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
... Gentle walking event. On the other hand, least participation was seen in basketball in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Number
...1997 to fewer than 5,000 people in 2017.Number of participants for Football and hiking...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, still, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3738317757 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80907129806 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560747663551 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.7649715305 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158140280521 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727420700083 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566655640953 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113063520626 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482339843776 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.