The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart compares the number of incidents and injuries every 100 million passenger miles traveled by five different types of transport in 2002.
It can be seen from the chart that demand-response transport witnessed the highest number of both incidents and injuries in 2002. By contrast, there were the lowest figures in incidents and injuries happened to passengers traveled on commuter rails.
According to the graph, on demand-response vehicles were 225 incidents and 173 injuries, which were both highest and three times as high as the second highest transport services – buses. Statistically, there were 76 incidents and 66 people were injured while travelling on the buses.
Moving on to rails, it can be said from the graph that rail services were safer than two other means of tranports. Although the number of incidents occurred on light rails was equal to that on buses, the injuried people were fewer than those travelled by buses, at only 39. Travelers on heavy rails experienced fewer such events than those on light rails, but commuter rails were the vehicles that saw the fewest number of incidents and injuries in 2002, at only 20 incidents and 17 injuries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e vehicles that saw the fewest number of incidents and injuries in 2002, at only ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12307692308 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67914241433 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3762214789 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22844875521 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127581666237 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109246864771 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191293661579 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122070146654 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.