The information in this chart illustrates the change in the share's foreign, who study in university levels for a Canadian city, in two period, where are 2001 and 2006. As a overall trend, we can see clearly that an average of international students obviously rise all the period by province.
Turning in the graph, it seems that over than one to ten students were international people in three cities ( New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, British Columbia) since 2006, increased significantly compared with same information in 2001. By the way, nearly 12% of students studied in New Brunswick going for another countries at the end of period, in comparative of less than 7% in the first period.
The figure show definitively that the average of international students in the rest of cities went up by more than 3%, in 2006 has been over than about 7% , while in 2001 were less than 6%. For instance, Manitoba city has been amount of international students about 7% in 2006, but in 2001 were approximately 4%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'city'?
Suggestion: city
...udy in university levels for a Canadian cities, in two period, where are 2001 and 2006...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...two period, where are 2001 and 2006. As a overall trend, we can see clearly that ...
^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... by province. Turning in the graph, it seem that over than one to ten students were...
^^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere international people in three cities New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, British Colu...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 3%, in 2006 has been over than about 7% , while in 2001 were less than 6%. For in...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...006, but in 2001 were approximately 4%.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, for instance, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82973807178 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.2722714927 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235885729428 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122174867423 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686528231535 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163888472079 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594309117049 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.