The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The three pie charts represent the total school spending by year in Britain one three period of time 1981,1991 and 2001.
Overall, it seems that the school spend a large part of budget in teachers salaries, but the insurance is less spending sector.
The three circular graphs show that staff wage in school dropped by 13%, in the first plan spending is about 18%, moreover in the third figure it is nearly 15%. While, the amount of insurance grew by just over 5%, in 1991 the expenditure was to almost 3%, ten years later it was less than ten.
Finally,we can see the variation in spending on resources books and teachers' wage, in the three round charts the first rate peaked to almost a fifth in the second period, the latter peaked at about half in 1991.There was a considerable fluctuation in furniture spending, which peaked at around 23% at the end of the time.

Votes
Average: 2.7 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...l spending by year in Britain one three period of time 1981,1991 and 2001. Overall, it se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree period of time 1981,1991 and 2001. Overall, it seems that the school spend ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the insurance is less spending sector. The three circular graphs show that staf...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ten years later it was less than ten. Finally,we can see the variation in spen...
^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...ater it was less than ten. Finally,we can see the variation in spending on re...
^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...the latter peaked at about half in 1991.There was a considerable fluctuation in furni...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61935483871 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36608010592 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7284622847 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 5.23603664747 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191911106527 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113140405189 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912530497093 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131778471267 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903307352784 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.