THe chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.
The line graph compares the income gap by gender in five major nations between 1978 and 2008.
Overall, as can be seen from the given chart, the income disparity in Japan was by far highest in comparison with the relatively small figures in Australia and the UK over 3 decades. Besides, there was a decrease trend in all nations, although in the last decade examined, the number of Australia saw a sudden rise.
In 1978, the percentage of difference between genders' salary in Japan was nearly 48 per cent, followed by a downward tendency until reaching just above 40 per cent after 30 years period. Similarly, the figures for the US and the UK also decreased steadily, from around 34 per cent and 29 per cent, respectively to approximately 27 per cent in 2008. This tendency was also the case with France, from half of that of Japan in the initial stage to only 18 per cent in the final years examined.
Australia had the smallest proportion of salary disparity between males and females at about 18 per cent in 1978. It then also experienced a slight fall in the first decade prior to remaining relatively stable in the following 10 years. However, it afterwards went up in 1998, overtaking that of France. By 2008, income gap in Australia had reached around 25 per cent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...des. Besides, there was a decrease trend in all nations, although in the last dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71555555556 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54170157839 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1738994996 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170628011966 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697111567798 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620340004806 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116693252294 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501739709338 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.