The chart below shows percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 200 to 2012.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 200 to 2012.

The line chart presents information about female parliamentarian in some European countries between 2000 and 2012, measured in percentage (%).

In 2000, proportion of parliament female members in Germany was the highest with 33% over the other nations, and it rose slightly in 2004, at 35%. At the same period, the figures of other nations, Italy and France, increased slightly to 31% and 27% respectively, while there was a dramatic rise by 7% in the percentage of parliament female members in both Belgium and UK within 4 years.

By 2012, the portion of female working in parliament in Germany had remained a slight rise, but it had been overtaken by Italy at the end of period. 2004 to 2012 saw a significant increase in portion of France female parliamentarian, followed by UK which had risen dramatically from 9% to 23% in 2012. Rising slightly in 2008, the percentage of female parliamentarian in Belgium had recovered at 24% in 2012.

Overall, The percentage of female working as parliament member in five European countries rose significantly over the period, whereas the most remarkable rise was seen in figure of United Kingdom.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a slight rise, but it had been overtaken by Italy at the end of period. 2004 to ...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by Italy at the end of period. 2004 to 2012 saw a significant increase in porti...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15425531915 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02546511357 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0132631072 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331043792443 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168001826385 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625705698813 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216845803732 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511612536235 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.