The chart below shows the percentage of films produced by 5 different countries in 3 years.
The bar chart compares the proportion of the producing films by five countries from 2007 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear that three of countries witnessing an increase in the percentage of the films which were produced, while two countries experienced a slight decline in their figures.
The percentage figures for producing films in three countries B, D and E all grow slightly. For country B had a significant rise from 33% in 2007 to 50% in 2009. After that ,the increases of countries D and E were more modest about 2% rise, reaching 15% and 7% respectively in 2009.
In contrast, for countries A and C, had a slight decrease in their figures. The percentage of film produced in country A was the highest, but fell steadily from 80% in 2007 to 75% in 2009. With country C, the figures fluctuated. The proportion rose slightly the following year from 20% in 2007 to 22% in 2008, then fell to 19% in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which were produced, while two countries experienced a slight decline in their fi...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...m 33% in 2007 to 50% in 2009. After that ,the increases of countries D and E were ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61963190184 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73626509584 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7932156472 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6666666667 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268496887443 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131644098698 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949960983861 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192623841416 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363362630898 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.