The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart shows the rate of two genders teachers in six particular types of educational institutions in the UK in 2010.
It can be observed that the proportions of female academics in educational institutions dominant the proportions of male academics.
According to the given data, nursery, primary and Secondary school have the women’s percentage outnumbered the men’s proportion, especially in Pre-school and primary school, with approximately 98% and 96%. that of men had the lowest numbers, only below 10% of each.
As can be seen from the diagram, particularly in college, men and women were equally represented ,with about 50% of each while in higher-level school most of the teachers were male. In Private training institute, nearly 55% of the teachers were male compared to the female teachers, about 45%. University had the highest percentage of male teacher, nearly tripled the percentage of female teacher.
Overall, there were discrepancies between two genders’ proportions in five educational setting, except the proportion in the college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nant the proportions of male academics. According to the given data, nursery, pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...school, with approximately 98% and 96%. that of men had the lowest numbers, only bel...
^^^^
Line 10, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., men and women were equally represented ,with about 50% of each while in higher-l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68098159509 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18216311156 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601226993865 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8704733093 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206425345315 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101788914289 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938564132707 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119694435175 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100778893921 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.