The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.
The graph illustrates the changing pattern in the proportion of international students graduating in various provinces of Canada from 2001 to 2006.
It can be observed that there were some discrepancies between the proportions of international graduates in 2001 and 2006. The percentages in 2006 clearly dominated the percentages in 2001.
In 2001, new Brunswick had the highest percentage of international graduates, about 7%, tripled the Ontario’s number, with about 2.6%. That of the nova scotia and Quebec were nearly the same at 6.5%, while other provinces were below 6%, which were Alberta, british Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Labrador.
In comparison, in 2006, the figure of new Brunswick soared, approximately 11.8% . In addition, the number of students graduating in nova scotia and british Columbia also levelled out, about 10.5% compared to the Quebec’s number peaked at 8.5%, leaving other provinces below 8%. Alberta was the only region dipped from 6% in 2001 to 4.5% in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovinces of Canada from 2001 to 2006. It can be observed that there were some ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y dominated the percentages in 2001. In 2001, new Brunswick had the highest p...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bia, Manitoba, Ontario and Labrador. In comparison, in 2006, the figure of ne...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ew Brunswick soared, approximately 11.8% . In addition, the number of students gra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5641025641 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03149920393 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608974358974 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3746630716 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403834484615 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176945910993 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11011128151 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268197326174 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105429167221 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.