The chart below shows the percentage of people who are five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008.
The column chart illustrates the information about the comparison that the number of male, female and pupils who are the fruits and vegetables each day in the U.K between 2001 and 2008.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that the proportion of women who were more like to eat in the both food items rather than men and children did not prefer to eat the fruits and vegetables per day, over the given period of time.
To commence with, in initially year, it was seems to be very ordinary that in the U.K the gender of female consumed more food, which was the most highest about 22% in 2001. Surprisingly, in the next five years the figure for consuming a couple of products each day considerably had increased slightly accounting for 32% and which was reach to peak point by 2006. But, in 2001 to 2003, male and pupils were show to the equal interest on fruits and vegetables per day selling product approximately 18%.
Moving to further, in the next three years, the gender of men and children preferred eat the fruits and vegetables each day which was 23% of pupils and 28% of male, respectively. Finally, in the last year the figure for the women, men and children started decrease to 28%, 25% and 23% by 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...fruits and vegetables each day in the U.K between 2001 and 2008. A quick look on...
^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... and vegetables per day, over the given period of time. To commence with, in initially year, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...seems to be very ordinary that in the U.K the gender of female consumed more food...
^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...emale consumed more food, which was the most highest about 22% in 2001. Surprisingly, in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49553571429 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40143302642 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540178571429 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.9774369104 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.857142857 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249358029183 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121190236708 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903135708056 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161187933837 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690757478661 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.