The bar graph illustrates the alterations in the proportion of pupils who consumed fruit and vegetables in the UK in between 8 years (2001 to 2008).
Overall, amongst all, women were the main consumer of fruit and vegetables throughout the given period in UK.
It is pretty evident that in comparison to others the proclivity of women towards fruits and vegetables was maximum in initial year which was 22% then a gradual growth of approximately 3% was recorded in each year till 2005. Moving on, after attaining its zenith point in 2006 with 40% the percentage of consumption of fruits and vegetables of female was declined by11% till the end.
Strolling further, the least proportion of children had fruits and vegetables in their daily intake which was 13% in 2001 and this data was only 2% less than the percentage of male even in next 2 years these fraction remained similar. Afer that, the percentage of both children and men who consumed fruit and vegetables incremented by 5% and 3% respectively. This inclination path was going on in case of men with 2% till 2006 in terms of taking fruits and vegetables. Whereas, the proportion of eating fruits and vegetables of children augmented rapidly as late as 2007 which was just over quarter. But in the ending year the data of ingesting fruits and vegetables in both children and men case was dropped by 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fraction' or 'these fractions'?
Suggestion: this fraction; these fractions
...percentage of male even in next 2 years these fraction remained similar. Afer that, the percen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82553191489 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7046428234 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1264341792 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19053942861 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991812926242 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525458019789 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130437262497 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506016753295 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.