The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The proportion of the British people (Men, Women and Child), who consumed regular basis suggested amount of fruits and vegetables over the period of given years 2002, 2006 and 2010, is illustrated by the rendered bar graph.
In the overall perspective, it is ostensible that the percentage of women was maximum, while of children was least in having commodities, during the stated time period.
To begin with the year 2002, with exact 25 percent, females was highest category as compared to males and children, where the data was 22%, 11% respectively. In subsequent year 2006, however, people took more food items than past year 2002. This rose to 32% for ladies, but increase in this section was more than gents, was just near to the 28%. Here again, lowest data (16%), recorded of juveniles who ate small quantity of diet.
Probing further, Womanish figure declined by 5% and reached at 27% in year 2010 from 32%, was in 2006. After experiencing a surge of around 6% in 2006 adult male’s graph shows a drop of 4% in next year 2010. Adolescents was on third position in terms of consumption of fruits and greens which shares the number of approximately 14%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... illustrated by the rendered bar graph. In the overall perspective, it is osten...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...ar 2002, with exact 25 percent, females was highest category as compared to males and child...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...ts, was just near to the 28%. Here again, lowest data 16%, recorded of juveniles who ate...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...27% in year 2010 from 32%, was in 2006. After experiencing a surge of around 6% in 20...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, third, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.865 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53660698572 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5507366949 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138907165607 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567854679175 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521584335193 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901500212427 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618516480604 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.