The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information regarding the consumption of electricity by distinct fields in Eastern part of the Australia in 2007 and 2010 is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data is calibrated in percentage.
Overall, it is ostensible that there was no alteration in the proportion of electricity utilized by all the categories except Aluminum, Manufacturing and other metals. Increasing trend in other metals, while decreasing in Aluminum and Manufacturing is lucid throughout the period.
Turning to the details, the ration of electricity used for Residential purpose was maximum (28%) as compared to others and remained same for both the years 2007 and 2010. Second highest was Commercial, the figure was under quarter and there was again no change in it in given time. Agriculture and Transport shared the equivalent data in 2007 and 2010. It was just below the tiny portion.
Probing further, the unchanged use of power for Mining over the three years was 9 percent. Interestingly, other metals rose slightly from 12% to 18% in last year. Although, Aluminum was roughly 2% more than 11 % in 2010. Before, dropping at 9 % in 2010, witnessed count was 13% in 2007 for Manufacturing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... slightly from 12% to 18% in last year. Although, Aluminum was roughly 2% more than 11 %...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12953367876 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98779458837 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2357335354 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116577158382 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462066891533 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563904356701 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819691289795 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607265127115 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.