The bar graph below shows the number of own operated and Franchised restaurants from 2007 to 2012 in Someland.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The comparison, how many Own Operated and Franchised Restaurants were established in Someland over the period of 5 years, commencing with 2007 is illustrated by the rendered bar graph.
In the overall perspective, it is ostensible that the Personally operated resorts increased, while Franchised resorts fluctuated in the given time period.
Turning to the details, in the initial year, 2007, total number (522) of franchisees were nine times higher than Personal Restaurants which was 58. In the following year 2008, a hike of 58 and 4 can be seen for both former and later category respectively. The drop of three Franchised eateries as well an addition of almost 101 in Personal eateries is visible in year 2009.
Probing further, maximum Self Operating food business was recorded, 77 in year 2010. Whereas, in the same year Franchisees of food businesses were 712. A decrease of 10 was experienced by first mentioned category, however, an increase of 101 again by second described category in subsequent year 2011. In third quadrant of 2012, accounted figure was 913 and 71 of Own handled and Settled Franchisees correspondingly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...business was recorded, 77 in year 2010. Whereas, in the same year Franchisees of food b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2349726776 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03508503485 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9065772571 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.444444444 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149232944385 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581007723354 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791299693017 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10554740026 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941575240731 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.