In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, in several nations western cuisines are overshadowing the value of traditional foods which are affecting the families, individuals and society. I largely endorse the given notion and the arguments favoring my contention will be enunciated in the impending paragraphs.
The foremost argument to support my view is, it leads clashes among the family members. When people go outside for junk food then they miss to spend quality time with their loved ones and this cause arguments within them. Allied to this, the saturated fats that this food involved could be the reason of various chronic diseases such as cardiovascular, diabetes etcetera and the treatment of this can misbalance the budget of the family. Eventually, it affects family and an individual directly.
Concomitantly, as the trend of new dishes has put impacts on all the conventional food businesses they are becoming economically week because of low market of these edible items. For example, a recent survey by Cambridge university revealed that theses food and beverages organizations faced a loss of 25, 00,000 million dollars in last decade just because of these street foods.
This diet, notwithstanding, is the way of time saving. This food not only be cooked easily but also within the few seconds, since it saves the time of the people in the prevailing fast moving era. That’s why most of the people preferring it in these days.
By analyzing, although its time effective point is beneficial for ones who are busy in their hectic life. I, however, believe that it has far more negative impacts than positive on the each and every aspect of the society in the way it the root of several detrimental diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'miss spending'.
Suggestion: miss spending
...ople go outside for junk food then they miss to spend quality time with their loved ones and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'theses'' or 'thesis's'?
Suggestion: theses'; thesis's
...y by Cambridge university revealed that theses food and beverages organizations faced ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08127208481 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78116341792 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650176678445 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5676796782 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.615384615 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241544022978 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722885843586 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510027440962 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115531784625 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407714808225 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.