Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Over the last half-century, there has been booming breakthrough in the transportation. Among these, trains, as well cars are the most popular methods of travelling in the present time. However, one of the most conspicuous trend in today’s world is colossal upsurge in the number of people who believe that expenditure must be done on railways rather than on roads by the government. I strongly agree with the view, the liable authorities should allocate balance between these both means of transportation. The ensuing paragraphs will enunciate my point of view clearly.
Firstly, cars and private vehicles plays inevitable role in daily life. They are considered the easy and convenient way of moving from one place to other. As these can go everywhere such as hospitals, houses and markets as well. On the top of this, effective investment on this infrastructure not only control traffic in congested areas, but also will prevent detrimental accidents on the highways or roads; for instance, a recent survey of USA (United States of America) in 2017 represented a reduction of 25% incidents on the roads because the government increased its budget for improvement in this sector.
Railways, on the contrary, is the foremost system to travel distant destinations. Travel, through trains for the places which are far away is definitely uncomplicated as compared to vehicles on roads. In addition to this, due to modern advancement locomotive engines runs on electricity, which is far more inexpensive than roads and create less pollution than cars. Third benefit of this, it is fast and can cover the thousands of miles of distance within few hours of day. A best example can be seen in the Russia which is more advance in the concept of moving and reaching at remote areas because of its well-developed tramlines in every nook and corner of this territory.
In conclusion, although there might be several conflicts on the aforementioned methods but these methods have equivalent significance for movement in various sides of a specific country. Therefore, in my opinion, equal money spending would be a best option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the easy and convenient way of moving from one place to other. As these can go...
^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...es of distance within few hours of day. A best example can be seen in the Russia ...
^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... opinion, equal money spending would be a best option. ...
^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... money spending would be a best option.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, third, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18895348837 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98349156934 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642441860465 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.5126383138 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159028079943 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365967657585 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477011133124 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792271277941 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256941422475 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.