The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.

The chart illustrates the proportion of expenditure of British people on a rate of fruit and vegetables in three years.
At first glance, it is clear that the percentage of women consuming was highest, while fruit and vegetable are consumed lowest by children. Especially, this food is consumed by men, which did not change significantly over the period.
In 2002, 25% of women ate fruit and vegetable, which was higher than 22% of men. Over the following four years, the percentage of men and women consumed on this food, increased 28% and 32% respectively. However, there was a slight decline in the figure for expenditure men and women, just approximately 5% in 2010.
In term of children, consuming 11% on food in the first year, which figure is witnessed an upward trend in 2006, at 16%. By 2010, however, the percentage of children consuming on fruit and vegetable has decreased marginally by 14%.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'consumed the lowest'.
Suggestion: consumed the lowest
... highest, while fruit and vegetable are consumed lowest by children. Especially, this food is c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etable has decreased marginally by 14%.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84583299441 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.999540435 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226403825032 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107472723959 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706183820476 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144984551215 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356594641819 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.