Overall, there were a sharp rise in the percentage of school-leavers who left school embarking on higher education and the proportion of the amount money they earned. In addition, high-school graduates who earned more than national average had the highest proportion of graduate earnings, whereas those who were unemployed were occupied at the lowest place.
Taking a closer look on the pie charts, the percentage of the school leavers entering higher education started at nearly a tenth of the total proportion in 1987. The high-education graduates with earning more than national average controlled a large share which accounted for a half of the total percentage of graduate earnings. Similarly, an important percentage of graduate earnings was of students form higher education who earned less than national average which represented about a quarter of the total proportion. Unlike other graduates after graduation at higher education for one year, only a small segment of the graduate earnings was of students who were unemployed, likewise, there was a small proportion for high- education with earning more than double the national average with around 10 percent. The high- school graduates were double than in 2007 with around a half of all the percentage for a period of 20 years. In addition, the graduates who were unemployed and those high-school students who earned more than double national average were 3 percent and 7 percent respectively
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, look, similarly, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32608695652 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85735544713 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447826086957 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3004792092 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.125 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32367372143 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17740497129 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449378105602 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267390612607 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511280307192 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.