The graph below show the weekday volume of passengers activity on the Toronto Metro System for July 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below show the weekday volume of passengers activity on the Toronto Metro System for July 2007

The line graph illustrates the activity of passengers weekly on the Toronto Metro System.
Overall, the maximum number of people usually used the Toronto Metro System at 8 in the morning and 6 in the evenings .
Taking a closer look on the line graph, in the beginning, the activity of the Toronto Metro System started at 6 am with around 100 thousand people. Then, it increased gradually before reaching a peak at 400 thousand people at 8 am. After that, there was a sudden decline on the number of people from 9 to 10 which represented the lowest with nearly 200 thousand.
Going further, after a sudden decrease at 10 am, it climbed to more than 300 thousand people at 12 in the morning until decreasing tremendously to approximately 100 thousand people was the same as the the number of passengers using the Toronto Metro System at 6 am. In addition? The number of travelers from 8 to 9 and between 6 and 7 showed the same patterns, they both had the more the passengers than the other hours. However, afterwards, the number of passengers kept on decreasing when it was at 10 pm, there were roughly 150000 people present on the Toronto Metro System.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t 8 in the morning and 6 in the evenings . Taking a closer look on the line grap...
^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ely 100 thousand people was the same as the the number of passengers using the Toronto ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ely 100 thousand people was the same as the the number of passengers using the Toronto ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ng the Toronto Metro System at 6 am. In addition? The number of travelers from 8 to 9 an...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6487804878 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63465255762 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492682926829 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2554700559 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213095688481 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115757579365 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118262000349 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193403490318 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114968640998 0.0819641961636 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.