The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph provides, the information of US population, who are aged over 65 in percentage from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, as bar chart demonstrates, the ratio of aged people are gradually increasing by time , where, the proportion of between 65 to 74 aged group are highest among others aged groups.
To the begin, in 1990 the ratio of aged was around 5%, in which almost 3% are between 65-74 aged group, below 84 was 1% and over 84 was 0.2%. The total ratio of aged citizens are slightly peaking but the proportion of over 85 years is in steady level till 1930. However, in 1940, 4.8% are accounts for 65 to 74 aged group and 1.7% and o.3% for 75 to 84 and over 85 aged respectively. Thereafter, in 1960 and 1970, the proportion of 65 to 74 aged group remain constant with 6.1%, however, the total ratio was gradually hiking and reached nearly 10% of total population of USA. The highest level of aged population was accounted in 1990, over 12% of total population, where, 7.3% was between 65 to 74, 4% was 75 to 84 and 1.2% was over 85 aged groups. Hence, 7.3% was the peak percentage of aged group between 65 to 74 over the period. Moreover, in 2000, the total population of aged group slightly decreased by 1% and the 64-74 aged group also decrease than previous year (6.5%), however, 75 to 84 and over 85 increase by 0.4% and 0.3% respectively, with their highest proportion all over the time lapse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... people are gradually increasing by time , where, the proportion of between 65 to ...
^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e highest among others aged groups. To the begin, in 1990 the ratio of aged was around 5...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are accounts for 65 to 74 aged group and 1.7% and o.3% for 75 to 84 and over 85 a...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed respectively. Thereafter, in 1960 and 1970, the proportion of 65 to 74 aged g...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, in 1960 and 1970, the proportion of 65 to 74 aged group remain constant with...
^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lation of USA. The highest level of aged population was accounted in 1990, over 1...
^^
Line 3, column 999, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an previous year 6.5%, however, 75 to 84 and over 85 increase by 0.4% and 0.3% re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47081712062 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49436899638 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443579766537 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9523428876 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268971288489 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152415934626 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455086033535 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212302357481 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327338056931 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.