The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of people volunteering in various kinds of organizations in 2008 and 2014.
Overall, the upward trend was represented by people working in education, health care, and unspecified fields, while the other 3 categories experienced the opposite trend. It is noticeable that in both years, healthcare remained the least attractive area for volunteers.
In 2008, nearly a quarter of the total volunteers worked for education, followed by the figure for environmental and art organizations, at 21% and 18% respectively. 18% of volunteers took part in sports and unspecified projects, which was more than double the percentage of health care.
In 2014, the number of volunteers working in environmental and sports fields saw a significant rise compared with the other fields, at 29% and 25% respectively. Meanwhile, the figures for art and other volunteers both fell by 6%. There was a slight fall in volunteers in educational organizations at 17% while growing by a humble 1% to 8%, volunteering in health care was the least preferred option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time to women s sport and men s sport 56
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain Others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3567251462 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27042306787 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.902428539 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230798851813 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10602744784 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108366659878 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165959895172 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132013001311 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.