The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of people belonging to different categories of migrants and natives visiting to different places in Canada.
Overall, Cinema was the most visited place in case of people born in Canada and migrants who were born in English speaking nations whereas library was most popular place to visit for migrants of other countries. On the opposite side, the least visited place was theatre and this trend was same across all the categories of people.
Regarding people going to Cinema, around two-third of the total people born in Canada visited a Cinema, almost same number of migrants of English speaking countries also visited Cinema. But in case of migrants of other nations only half of them visited Cinema. I case of Zoo, around one-half of migrants of English speaking nations went there, Canadian born citizens were also not far behind and more than 40% of them visited the zoo.
New migrants born in countries other than English speaking nations rarely went to theatre (only 10% of total) whereas the number of people of other categories who visited the theatre was almost double. But on the contrary, more than 50% of the migrants of other countries visited a library which was more than people who were born in Canada and other English speaking countries (40% and around 38% respectively).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, third, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3896470693 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400900900901 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.224440295 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139559617938 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854863556924 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059003795925 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121910116117 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580227977422 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.