Here, the table demonstrates the ratio of salary utilize on 4 varied types of products by adults as well as children in the UK in the year 1998, units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it is manifest that the most striking feature is music which dominance the market by the UK citizens, however rest of the items percentages is made fluctuation.
At a first glance, the table reveals that in food the sector, the percentage of income expenditure by adult were presented quarter while other three products the percent was less than 5%. The ratio of both men and women spend they remuneration on food was 14% and 39% respectively. As regard to music both the gender percentages were identical, It was 5%. It is interesting to note that children spend they income on videos and food which was almost sum of electronic equipment, 23%.
Further analysis of the table portrays that the boys were the optimum to spend they money on music, It comprised 38%. It can be clearly seen that the both the items, electronic equipment and videos were spent similar proportion. although the percentage of music were presented maximum percent, it were 40% of girls, yet remaining items percentages depicts well below 11% barring videos, it were 17%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be clearly seen that the both the items, electronic equipment and videos were spe...
^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...d videos were spent similar proportion. although the percentage of music were presented ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... yet remaining items percentages depicts well below 11% barring videos, it were 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87203791469 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66435027386 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568720379147 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8208929366 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14099629048 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536579248922 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488630857773 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899705048399 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409499965378 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.