The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the percentage of residents' coffee and tea purchasing and consuming habits in five cities in Australia (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart).
As can be seen from the chart, most people in these cities went to a cafe to have coffee or tea, except Adelaide. Additionally, fresh coffee was the least common choice for consumers living in the five cities surveyed.
Residents drinking coffee or tea in a cafe accounted for the largest percentage in Hobart, followed by Melbourne and Sydney, at 64% and 61% respectively. In terms of Sydney and Melbourne, the proportions for people consuming instant coffee were 46% and 48% respectively, while the figure for Hobart's consumers of this product was significantly higher, at around 54%. Although 38% of citizens in Hobart purchased fresh coffee, 44% of Sydney's residents and 43% of those in Melbourne consumed this type of coffee.
Moving on to the two remaining cities, the allocation of people buying fresh coffee was in the vicinity of 35%, which made this coffee the least common product for residents in Brisbane and Adelaide. While going to a cafe for coffee or drink accounted for the largest percentage of those living in Brisbane, at around 55%, 50% of residents in Adelaiden opted for this choice. The allocation of people residing in Brisbane consuming instant coffee was slightly lower than that of Adelaide, at 53% and 50%, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16239316239 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80499486654 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6680911388 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141286549971 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781405086972 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499863614124 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118136175652 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494545394039 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.