The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given chart illustrates the drinking habits of people in 5 different Australian cities over the last 4 weeks.
As can be seen from the graph, it is immediately obvious that the percentage of residents going to a café for coffee or tea occupied the highest by far in most of the surveyed cities with the exception of Adelaide. It is also apparent that buying fresh coffee is the least common compared to the other 2 habits.
There were nearly 65% of citizens in Melbourne and Hobart visited cafés for coffee or tea. This figure for Sydney is quite lower at more than 60%, followed by Brisbane at 55%, and finally Adelaide at approximately a half. Adelaide was the only city that had the allocation of buying instant coffee higher than that of going to a café, at 50%. In Hobart, instant coffee purchases accounted for about 55%, ahead of Brisbane at 52%, Melbourne at 48%, and lastly Sydney (just over 45%).
Fresh coffee purchase was most common in Sydney and took up around 45%. This number for Melbourne and Hobart were 42% and 38% in order. In Brisbane and Adelaide, the proportions of people buying this kind of coffee were much lower and roughly the same, at over a third.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...t by far in most of the surveyed cities with the exception of Adelaide. It is also apparent that buyi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, lastly, so, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63033175355 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3976171695 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7553677446 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216597772679 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909922835454 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787060111908 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156320820613 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821537193884 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.