The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The bar chart compares the percentage of researches in coffe and tea bying and driking habits in five Australian cities.
Overall, it can been clear seen that, there was the highest percentage of went to cafe for coffe or tea in last 4 weeks in Melbourne whereas the smallest percentage of people bought fresh coffe in last 4 weeks in Brisbane.
According to the bar chart, we can see that in Adelaide around 50% of people went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks. However, in Hobart it rose significantly about 38% . The one of the highest percentages of in Brisbane approximately 53% of people bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks while in Sydney it considerably decreased to just over 45%.
The second highest percentage of bought fresh coffe in last 4 weeks in Melbourne with just under 45% but in Hobart it declined around 38% . The only similarity between the people bought instant coffee and went to a cafe for coffes in last 4 weeks with around 50% and about 49%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
... five Australian cities. Overall, it can been clear seen that, there was the highest ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n Hobart it rose significantly about 38% . The one of the highest percentages of i...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...45% but in Hobart it declined around 38% . The only similarity between the people ...
^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... but in Hobart it declined around 38% . The only similarity between the people boug...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58192090395 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57025743388 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474576271186 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2366614745 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155618230723 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904964745965 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675335853648 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1203434786 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708171227201 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.