The given chart gives information about the results of a survey carried out in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart with the aim of exploring people’s coffee and tea purchasing and drinking habits.
It is apparently ready that people in these five regions prefer going to a cafe the most. Following that, the proportion of instant coffee purchased is relatively high and similar in the surveyed areas whereas consuming fresh coffee is the least common choice.
Turning to the detail, Melbourne, Hobart and Sydney people went to a cafe most frequently, at 63%, 62,8% and 61% respectively while in two remaining cities, the percentage of that is lower than 55%/ Next, regarding instant coffee, the highest percentage was recorded in Hobart where there were nearly 55% of the surveyed residentials bought this type of beverage in last 4 weeks. Meanwhile, only 45% of Sydney people went for instant coffee in that period of time, which is slightly lower than the corresponding proportion in the rest with 50% in average.
Lastly, when it comes to the consumption of fresh coffee, it is clear that it is favoured the most in Sydney and Melbourne, where there were approximately 44% of residents acquiring fresh coffee in recent weeks. In addition, minimal percentage is witnessed in three other cities: there was only 38% of that in Hobart whereas Adelaide and Brisbane witnessed the same proportion at 34,5%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... people went for instant coffee in that period of time, which is slightly lower than the corre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Sydney and Melbourne, where there were approximately 44% of residents acquiring...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, lastly, regarding, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10729613734 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70887878604 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8268455524 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.0 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173156339591 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847500290663 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085424537736 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124246233634 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986137026129 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.