The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.
the graph below gives information about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The graph compares the consumption of 6 different energy sources in the USA from 1980 with projection until 2030. The units are measured by Quadrillion.
Overall, the demand for energy in the US will continue to grow throughout the period, while this growth is slightly different between two categories, namely Fossil fuel and renewable.
At the beginning of the period, Patrol and oil consumed was 35q while this figures for coal and natural gas stood at 15 and 20q respectively. In spite of some fluctuation in these resource consumptions, all of them experienced a gradual growth for 35 years. oil consumed in 2015 is nearly 40q whereas consumption of two others is similar and reaches 25q. prediction shows natural gas consumption remained at this level until last year of given period, by contract a growth of 5q is anticipated for oil and coal.
In 1980, the perpotion of consumption of renewable and nuclear source was very low, approximately 4q. from 1980 until now, consumption of energy which was generated from atomic source has risen by 4q while this figure for renewable energy is 1q.Despite increasing and decreasing in Hydropower consumption, now this consume about 1980 figure(4q). It is predicted that this trend will continue for next 15 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent energy sources in the USA from 1980 with projection until 2030. The units ar...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... namely Fossil fuel and renewable. At the beginning of the period, Patrol a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 71, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., Patrol and oil consumed was 35q while this figures for coal and natural gas stood ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oil
...erienced a gradual growth for 35 years. oil consumed in 2015 is nearly 40q whereas ...
^^^
Line 13, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Prediction
... two others is similar and reaches 25q. prediction shows natural gas consumption remained ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...q is anticipated for oil and coal. In 1980, the perpotion of consumption of...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... source was very low, approximately 4q. from 1980 until now, consumption of energy w...
^^^^
Line 21, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Despite
... this figure for renewable energy is 1q.Despite increasing and decreasing in Hydropower...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing in Hydropower consumption, now this consume about 1980 figure4q. It is predi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8702043873 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8551698592 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134604911729 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592780208471 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872352041193 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104981941446 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091309212593 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.