The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002
The bar chart depicts the number of telephones calls in United States of America, in three batches, Local, National and international and Mobiles, between 1995 and 2002, in a duration of eight years.
Overall, as it can be seen local(fixed lines) was the most useful way with an up-down trend, while the other categories increased in the period.
As is given in the chart, the local type raised in the first five years and declined for three last years. local calls were almost 70 in 1995 gradually went up and reached 90 billion minutes in 1990. After that, a downward trend started until stood on a little more than 70 in the last year of the period. On the other hand, national and international and mobile categories had a development trend. national and international calls reached roughly 30 and approximately 60 in 1995 and 2002 respectively. Finally, there was a wild shot up for the third type of calls, mobiles, started by about two and finished by 45 billion minutes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Local
...ears and declined for three last years. local calls were almost 70 in 1995 gradually ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: National
...ile categories had a development trend. national and international calls reached roughly...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75882352941 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64918215492 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6542623601 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182693605057 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761470290069 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079878579811 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122461802859 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944537561014 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.