The bar chart below illustrates the changes in the total time spent on three different phone lines in the UK over the period of 1995-2002.
Originally, in 1995, the British public talked for over 70 billion minutes on local-fixed lines, almost 40 billion on national & international ones and a mere one billion using mobile phones. Over the time, the usage of local lines increased, reaching its maximum of 90 billion minutes in 1999. After that, it finished the period with slightly more than 70 billion minutes, which appeared to be as much as it was in the beginning of the period.
Meanwhile, the mobile and national & international dialing were gaining more popularity each year. Thus, the time spent on national & international phonecalls was rising gradually and ended the period up with a total time of 61 billion minutes in 2002. Although mobile phones were not used greatly at first, they obtained significant 12 billion minutes and then grew up rapidly finishing the period with 44 billion minutes.
Overall, the usage of both mobile and national & international lines expanded significantly over the period, whereas local lines despite being the most popular started to lose its significance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different phone lines in the UK over the period of 1995-2002. Originally, in 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21538461538 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75797463371 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6635466789 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175265274127 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085406559049 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803695446586 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122657934011 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929538101343 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.