The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph indicates the time was spent in phone calls including fixed lines and mobiles in the UK in the period of 1995 – 2002. Generally speaking, the number of minutes spent for fixed line in both national and international calls as well as mobile calls increased while local calls of fixed line experienced a fluctuated trend during the period.
To begin with, the largest amount of time of phone call went for local-fixed line, followed by the fixed line calls in both domestic and oversea. Mobiles in all category of phone call had the smallest amount that people spent for calling. Specifically, local-fixed line consumption increased from 72 billion minutes in 1995 then reached a peak in 1999 with 90 billion minutes. It eventually fell down to the same quantity of the year 1995 in 2002.
In a different situation, domestic and global calls in fixed line and mobiles rose their amount of minute year-by-year. The fixed line of domestic and oversea consumption gradually raised while the mobile calls consumption increased sharply. Mobiles started its incredible rises from 1999 till the end of the period of 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'calls'' or 'call's'?
Suggestion: calls'; call's
...ption gradually raised while the mobile calls consumption increased sharply. Mobiles ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02659574468 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63251661537 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3622957072 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128685125787 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675913654833 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327235964343 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10150160587 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224725214598 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.