The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates data about the total duration of telephone calls in the UK over a seven-year period, from 1995 to 2002.
Overall, there was an upward trend in two of the three categories, while the other one - local - underwent some fluctuations over the period in question.
Looking at the details, mobile phones were the least popular one at the beginning, as its figure started at only under 5 billions in 1995. After that, the total minutes for this category saw a gradual rise during the next 4 years, this was followed by a sharp increase starting from 1999 and finally this figure reached about 45 billions at the end of the period. With regards to national and international calls - fixed line, it can be seen that there was a similar pattern. However, the figure for this category only went up slightly, from roughly 37 to over 60 billions. Local - fixed line calls had always had the highest figure in the period, but it did not increase every year. In fact, the total duration did rise in the first half of the period and peaked at 90 billions in 1999, at which point it started to decrease marginally and finally returned to the figure which was same as the first year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6320754717 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38434465866 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2080891187 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131766022205 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612908349655 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553706036398 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104079822188 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720854005994 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.