Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this modern society, technological advancements have led to significant changes in every aspect of life, including how we interact with the outer world. As a result, integration has become one of the most popular trends worldwide, which means that all countries could now share their own features with others. Since people tend to use such integrated products, every nation will be the same as each other. This essay will point out several reasons why this would be more of a negative development.
To begin with, if integration is over-stimulated to such an extent that domestic products in all countries have no difference, then the world's diversity would be put in great danger. In simpler terms, using the same things in their daily life will affect the social characteristics of citizens, and finally reach a point by which they all do the same things. This could lead to the loss of certain cultural practices and the lack of such values would negatively influence the development of the world as a whole. Furthermore, since each nation no longer has unique features, national pride would be considerably reduced too. One of the crucial factors in keeping the world balanced is that each country and its citizens are proud of their distinctive identity, and interfering with this could lead to the collapse of a long-existed system. Consequently, people will have a tendency to feel dull and redundant once they don't have a special identity of their own.
However, many people hold the belief that such changes will exert a positive impact on society. It is their viewpoint that by using the same products and becoming more alike to each other, countries will be more willing to share and empathize with one another. An interesting result could be the greater bond between nations since there will be no social or cultural barriers between them.
To sum up, despite some good points it may bring, integration, in general, would be undoubtedly unsuitable if carried out to an overwhelming extent. Countries should all share some common features to ensure better communication and connection, but also be able to preserve their core values and view them as a unique one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... countries have no difference, then the worlds diversity would be put in great danger....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cy to feel dull and redundant once they dont have a special identity of their own. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, in general, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02479338843 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76786717952 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564738292011 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9628374135 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193916594277 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676739796888 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571795901561 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119262787573 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502313349967 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.