The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates data about the frequency that people ate in fast food restaurants in the USA over a ten-year period, from 2003 to 2013. Overall, almost all of the groups saw a slight decrease over these 10 years, with only two of them rising marginally. It is also notable that most people decided to have fast food once a week or once to twice every month, while the proportion for those who ate every day was the lowest throughout the period in question.
In 2003, people eating several times a week in fast food restaurants accounted for over 15%, at which point the percentage rose to 20% in 2006, before dipping by a margin of roughly 4% in 2013. The figures for people who ate once a week and once or twice a month both stood at approximately 30% in 2003. However, while the former experienced a slight decrease of nearly 5%, the latter increased to one-third over the next 10 years.
If we look at two opposite groups, people who ate fast food every day and those who never did, the disparity between their shares in 2003 was marginal, with both standing at around 5%. Both proportions saw a decline in 2006, after which they levelled off and remained stable until the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...iod, from 2003 to 2013. Overall, almost all of the groups saw a slight decrease over these...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53669724771 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3777446719 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5367327564 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189144753734 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875705215101 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894923960709 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134529095907 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349732334928 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.