The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the amount of fish and meat consumed by people in an European country in a 25-year period, from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, despite some fluctuations, chicken consumption increased over that time, while the opposite is true for beef, lamb and fish. It is obvious that chicken gradually replaced beef as the most favourite kind of food in the second half of the period.
In 1979, each person in this nation ate about over 200 grams of beef per week, compared to approximately 150 grams of chicken or lamb. The figure for fish was the lowest, with only 60 grams.
From that time to 2004, beef consumption dramatically fell for over 100 grams, while the figure for chicken showed a significant increase, peaking at 250 grams each person. The amount of lamb consumed also reduced to over 50 grams, and similarly, fish was less used in this nation, with its figure falling by about 15 grams per week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... of fish and meat consumed by people in an European country in a 25-year period, f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45457958467 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7045841823 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132058859345 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068651154344 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656810303693 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990819864331 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716273737273 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.