The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate the changes to how a city hospital could be accessed over a 3-year period, between 2007 and 2010. Overall, the hospital was more approachable for patients. Apart from the construction of two roundabouts, new infrastructures were also built, acting as facilitators of access to the site.
In 2007, the city hospital was surrounded by Ring Road, which is connected via a joint with Hostial Road. On this street, a series of six bus stops located on both sides enable public transport users to access the hospital, while a car park on the right was used by both staff and the public. In 2010, the two intersections connecting Hospital Road with Ring Road and City Road were replaced by the building of two roundabouts. A newly constructed bus stop also connected them, offering more road access. The original car park was also split into two; and while the position in which hospital staff could park their cars remained unchanged, the public needed to move to another one to the right of the hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...l Road. On this street, a series of six bus stops located on both sides enable publ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83522727273 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70396646782 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1710650187 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231919282742 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112881812944 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858116780402 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194327549001 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157552411157 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.