In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.`

In this increasingly integrated world, the demand for transportation between places has been increasing dramatically over the past few years, resulting in the need for better infrastructure. Many people, therefore, claim that we should invest in the construction of new railway lines for high-speed trains; while others hold the belief that focusing on improving the existing public transport is of greater importance. This essay will look into both sides of the argument and finally present my viewpoint.

On the one hand, it is reasonable to say that we should spend more money on building modern railway lines. An obvious advantage is that such trains are able to carry more passengers at once, thus reducing the number of trips required, compared with other means of transport. Furthermore, since very fast trains take far shorter amounts of time to move between destinations, it will save a lot of valuable time for users and enable them to spend it on other crucial tasks. In terms of environmental impact, up-to-date trains also gain quite a competitive advantage over others owing to the fact that they mainly rely on electricity and magnetism to operate, greatly reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants.

On the other hand, existing public transport also needs to be taken into consideration and upgraded. One of the reasons for this is the availability of these infrastructures, as they are already built all across the country. Once they are improved, these vehicles could be easily used my members of the public, while the construction of new railway lines may require more vacant space and their new routes are likely to be inconvenient for the inhabitants who are already used to a repetitive itinerary.

To sum up, despite some of the initial difficulties that we may face in the early stages, I believe that constructing state-of-the-art train lines will definitely prove to be an efficient investment in the long run. However, judging by the fact that this proposal costs huge sums of money to carry out, we will need a lot of support and encouragement from the citizens to initialize it.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...titive itinerary. To sum up, despite some of the initial difficulties that we may face i...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.111747851 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9615062258 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590257879656 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4756602878 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0833333333 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324550080209 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101475705416 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568190493193 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171135955696 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244768800628 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.