The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts illustrate data about the differences in yearly expenditure of a UK school over a twenty-year period, from 1981 to 2001.
Overall, teachers' salaries had always been the main contributing factor of total school spending, while little money was spent on insurance as they only took up under 10 percent. Another point that stands out from the graph is the other workers' salaries underwent a continuous decline over the period in question.
In 1981, four-tenths of the school's money was spent on paying for teachers, while that figure for other workers was lower, only at 28 percent. Resources such as books, together with furniture and equipment, only accounted for a small proportion of 15 percent each. Insurance had the least amount of money spent on it, with only 2 percent. Over the next twenty years, teachers' salaries saw some fluctuations and finally reached 45 percent of the total annual cost in 2001. Additionally, despite some changes, more budget was spent on insurance and furniture and equipment, at 8 and 23 percent respectively. As a result, money paid for other workers and resources was significantly reduced by nearly half.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...uestion. In 1981, four-tenths of the schools money was spent on paying for teachers,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11518324607 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75621508252 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.842591053 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855451264688 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367899027949 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589349459744 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861552551252 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750003136847 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.