The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate data about the shares of different kinds of nutrients in typical meals in the USA, and excessive consumption of them may exert negative impacts on our health.
Overall, sodium ranked first in two of the meals, namely dinner and lunch; while the highest contribution in snacks and breakfast is recorded in added sugar. Another striking feature is that dinner is the meal with the highest amount of those unhealthy substances.
In terms of breakfast, the disparity between the three proportions of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar is marginal, as they account for 14, 16 and 16 percent, respectively. While the first two see an increasing percentage in lunch, both at over a quarter, the latter is only a little bit higher, by 3 percent.
Regarding dinner, the majority of sodium is added to this meal, at over four-tenths. The figure for saturated fat is moderately lower, at 37 percent, while that of added sugar is just under a quarter. If we look into snacks, the amount of sodium added is the same as that of breakfast, and the percentage of fat is higher by a narrow margin (21 percent). Nearly half of the sugar is added into snacks, which is quite unhealthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...at over a quarter, the latter is only a little bit higher, by 3 percent. Regarding dinn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82038834951 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67071920443 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8011003593 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855452557673 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385007216951 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389584048019 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593462762522 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358944174896 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.