The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate information about the destination of UK graduates and postgraduates (apart from full-time jobs) in 2008.
Overall, further study was the most popular choice for both two types of students, while the number choosing to do voluntary work was the lowest among all categories.
As regards graduates, there were roughly under 30.000 students who decided to pursue higher education. Working part-time was the second-most preferred choice, with a figure of 17.735. Unemployment was a worrisome problem as the number of students with no jobs was only a bit smaller than that of part-time work, at over 16.000. Meanwhile, only 3.500 graduates worked for voluntary communities or organisations.
If we look at postgraduates, this trend was also true in 2008. Voluntary was the destination with the fewest pickers, as only 345 postgraduates chose to follow it. In contrast, a lot of students wanted to continue their study, and this popularity was matched by that of part-time work. The unemployed group was of average size, but was still worth paying attention.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, still, while, apart from, as regards, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3216374269 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97571764847 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672514619883 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8008116776 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134298797818 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623710772829 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063722317214 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10436409439 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841967683089 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.