Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Due to the significant and constant increase in population, traffic congestion has become one of the most prominent problems in every part of the world, especially in densely populated areas. Many people, therefore, hold the belief that building and upgrading more roads would be a suitable solution to tackle the problem. Others, however, suggest that governments should invest money in the construction of railways.This essay will outline some reasons why I side with the latter view.
To begin with, since roads are already too crowded, the erection of new train lines would encourage more people to switch to this means of transportation. As a consequence, this would reduce the strain on roads and enable commuters to move more efficiently. Another benefit of spending money on railways is that trains could reach a far higher velocity than cars and motorbikes, so passengers could arrive at their destination in a shorter time. What is more, when using trains, people don't have to monitor their own vehicles and observe their surroundings to avoid possible accidents. This means that they have a chance to comfort themselves during the trip by listening to music, or just simply enjoying the sceneries on the way.
Moreover, the most crucial benefit of building more railways is that trains are more environmentally friendly. Being able to carry a huge number of passenger at the same time, trains would make the amount of gas emission created per person considerably small, and motorbikes or cars would be nowhere near as eco-friendly as trains. Additionally, since trains usually use separate lanes and have fixed itineraries, they are very unlikely to cause any accidents such as crashing. This would ensure the safety for passengers to a far more extent than other types of vehicles on the road would.
To sum up, there are many advantages which investing in railways could bring, and this mean it would also provide better transportation experience for commuters, in terms of efficiency, safety and environmental issues. I, therefore, strongly believe that governments should spend their money on the construction of railways to improve the current situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...t money in the construction of railways.This essay will outline some reasons why I s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...What is more, when using trains, people dont have to monitor their own vehicles and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26436781609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87558549531 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4630089325 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192324780116 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659952291717 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584438765237 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116445487667 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388559504245 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.