The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps outline how a small island has been changed to provide better experiences for tourists. While the first map shows a bare area with no developments, the second one illustrates various developments which have been made on both land and sea.
Overall, the "before" island literally has nothing on it, featuring only a few treas in the West and about three times of that in the East. To the furthest West of the island, there is also a beach but it seems to be undeveloped with no signs of use.
In sharp contrast to the first map, the "after" one displays that significant improvements have been made, including a pier to the South, making it easier to access the islands by boats. Following this pier is a vehicle track leading to a great building named reception in the centre. From this point, tourists can easily get to accommodation facilities on both the East and West sides of the island, as a complete footpath system has been specially built for this purpose. The restaurant is to the North of the island, and visitors can get here by vehicles from the reception building. Additionally, the beach has finally been made safe for tourists, as there is a swimming area indicating that people now can visit this place.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8064516129 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89165274339 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594470046083 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5171276146 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120981296778 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482128076445 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327189235526 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824502448439 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101444339009 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.