The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural and land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates data about the main causes of agricultural land degradation, while the table highlights the way they exerted an impact on various parts of the world during the 1990s.
Overall, it can be seen that over-grazing and deforestation are the two main reasons making agricultural land become less productive. Besides, Europe saw the most serious degradation in land quality, with its figure far higher than that of the other two regions.
Looking at the pie chart, over one-third of land was reduced in productivity because too many animals were fed on them, followed by 30 percent deforested. While that, over-cultivation was also a notable factor, accounting for 28 percent of the total degradation, while other causes were considerable factors.
Regarding the table, nearly a quarter of land was degraded in Europe, with around 9.8 percent caused by deforestation. Oceania witnessed a slighter change, as only 13 percent of its land productivity was influenced. Surprisingly, only one-twentieth of the total land suffered from degradation in North America, and over-cultivation was the main reason here, responsible for about two-thirds of this figure.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, look, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46994535519 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20866015884 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.503968004 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206101605151 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929325924892 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777073559396 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137149810705 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716722603548 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.