The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph highlights data about the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by people in four different countries over a 40-year period, from 1967 to 2007.
What stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in carbon dioxide emissions in Portugal and Italy, while the UK and Sweden saw the opposite. Moreover, the United Kingdom had always been the country with the highest figure during the whole period in question.
In 1967, a person in Portugal would emit over 1 metric ton of carbon dioxide, which was the lowest at that time. Following this, there was a significant rise of about 4 metric tons over the next 40 years, at which point the figure leveled off at over 5 metric tons. This rate of increase was matched by that of Italy since the average carbon dioxide per person here also saw a substantial increase between 1967 and 1997. Subsequently, the figure remained stable at just under 8 metric tons until 2007.
However, if we look at Sweden, the amount of CO2 emitted went up sharply in the first ten years, after which it started to fall considerably by approximately 5 metric tons, and finally hit a trough at the end of the period. As regards the United Kingdom, the figure remained constant at under 11 metric tons until 1997, this was followed by a gradual decline till 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68695652174 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34550610014 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591304347826 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1274082646 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184599709641 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855008451917 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638498517677 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117728907875 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383671056925 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.